Although gangs are not a new
phenomenon but defiantly continue provide a unique challenge for law
enforcement and the legal system. According to the Department of Justice in
1998, there were over 28 thousand gangs with nearly 800,000 gang members in the
United States (2). This is a massive problem. There is a unique challenge with
combating gang violence, trying to find unique ways of targeting gangs without
trampling on people's rights. Two of the biggest legal issues I see with gang
enforcement deal with the legality or gang specific ordinances and profile
based policing.
A
very good example the issues with specific ordinances targeting gangs comes
with the case of The City of Chicago v.
Morales. The city of Chicago attempted to combat gang violence by passing a
ordinance against gang members loitering (2). As a result they were able to cite
people for failing to disperse. This ordinance eventually was challenged and
was brought the Supreme Court which voided it based on the vagueness in the
ordinance.
The
city attempted to pass a law which overall would be a good idea theoretically
to combat gang violence but due to the way it was written it was not fully
legal. Finding a effective way to combat gang loitering is a important thing
that should be balanced. I work as a intern for the Kent Police Department. On
a weekly basis, after school high school students who are gang members end up
loitering in the shopping mall parking lot across from the school. This
loitering almost always leads to very large group fights and even shootings but
it continues to happen every week. Despite it continuing to occur, the police
seem pretty much powerless to prevent it. There is no law or city ordinance
against loitering in the city, if there was this problem may be able to be
prevented. At the same time, is it really legal to cite people for simply being
gang members who are present at a certain place. Another problem is loitering
ordinances is that they seem to target gang members simply as their status as
gang members.
Another
legal issue that comes up with enforcement against gangs is the protection of
equal rights. There is a sad fact that frequent gang recruitment targets youth
in poorer racially diverse parts of the country (5). This is not to say that
minorities are the only ones who participate in gang activity, there are plenty
of white gangs. Especially with laws similar to the loitering ordinances, it is
very easy for law enforcement to simply profile gang members based on race
(14). In the case of Morales, police
targeted simply on the fact that a Hispanic person was loitering in a mostly
white neighborhood. People have a right not to be targeted based on their race.
Gangs
are something that do need to be enforced in order to prevent but this
enforcement should not come at the cost of the basic rights of people. The City
of Chicago attempted to combat this with a loitering ordinance. Unfortunately
the writing and application of this was too vague. I think that ideas such as the
loitering ordinance are a good step in the right direction in trying to find
the middle ground between effectively combating gang violence but also
protecting rights.
Discriminatory
enforcement further adds to this issue of a balance that needs to be created.
It is a good thing that police are proactively trying to stop gang violence. At
the same time, the people who are target for the police cannot be target just
for the fact that they are a gang member and a minority. The police cannot
racially profile someone based on their background or status as a gang member.
This practice is something I believe to be pretty widespread. Like the
loitering ordinance and other gang related laws a balance needs to be found.
Rather than simply targeting someone based on their race or standing the
specific criminal behavior of the person should be the focus of them being
targeted no their standing. This is important to protect the equal protection
of all people from being targeted.
No comments:
Post a Comment